No Nos For Nonprofits - A Dirty Half Dozen

Occasionally, you have to protect people frommotive to scratch the others' backs. Inurement can
themselves. Even those with the best of intentions cantake many other forms, from using an organization's
mess things up so badly that it can jeopardize whatvehicle for personal use to buying lunches on the
they are trying to accomplish. In the nonprofit world,company credit card.
there are best practices, good practices and3. Private benefit. Private benefit is the kid brother of
acceptable practices...and, really, really bad practicesinurement. It is best understood as any activity that
that will cause your organization, its board, donors andbenefits an individual (or company) who is not one of
beneficiaries headaches galore. In this article, we arethe organization's charitable beneficiaries. This can be
going to explore the Dirty (Half) Dozen Nonprofitovert, such giving vendor contracts to an insider's
No-Nos, in no particular order. Note: We will limit ourbusiness. It can also be subtle, such as endorsing any
discussion to 501(c)(3) nonprofits.for-profit company in exchange for financial support.
1. Dictatorships. If you want to be your own boss and4. Political activity. 501(c)(3) organizations are expressly
run the show as a benevolent dictator, then by allprohibited from intervening in a campaign for public
means, go start a business. Just don't start a nonprofitoffice. They cannot endorse or oppose any
organization. What many people fail to understandcandidates. They can, under limited and
before they establish a 501(c)(3) organization is thattightly-controlled circumstances, lobby for legislative
nonprofits do not have shareholders, i.e., owners...onlypurposes. If your organization's goals require any
stakeholders. Stakeholders can be defined as ansubstantial political activity, it should consider another
organization's board of directors, its members and itstax exempt status, such as 501(c)(4) social welfare.
beneficiaries. No one can legally assume ultimate5. Improper record keeping. This one is a biggie. Your
control. In fact, the IRS requires tax-exemptorganization simply must keep accurate records.
organizations to be structured such that control restsWhether it is the books, contributor records, or board
within a group of individuals. This protects everyonemeeting minutes, you cannot cut corners. The IRS will
involved. Many times we've seen placeholder boardshold your organization and its leaders responsible for
who basically rubber-stamp every decision made by acomplete and accurate records. The last thing you
dictatorially-inclined president or executive director. Thatwant is your board members personally penalized for
does everyone a disservice. Even worse, the IRS willa lack due diligence.
hold all the leaders accountable for the governance6. Failure to file required reports. The IRS requires all
and management of the organization, not just thetax-exempt organizations, including 501(c)(3)s, to file
dictator.annual Form 990. For those 501(c)(3) public charities
2. Inurement. Inurement is a fancy IRS word for insiderswith more than $25,000 in average annual gross
unfairly benefitting from the assets, resources orrevenue (and all private foundations), penalties for late
activities of the nonprofit they serve. Sometimes this isfiling add up at a rate of $20 per day up to a
overt misappropriation by the leaders of themaximum of $10,000 or 5% of the gross receipts,
organization. These are the charity leaders you seewhichever is less. Failure to file for three consecutive
fined, indicted or dragged before Congress. Moreyears will result in the automatic revocation of the
often, though, inurement is a product of notorganization's tax-exempt status. Most states require
understanding the limits of conflict of interest. Forannual reports, as well. Whether corporate annual
example, suppose a 501(c)(3) has 5 members on itsreports, or charitable solicitations reporting, you must
board of directors and 3 of those board members arestay current. It is a lot to keep up with, but it is a lot
paid employees of the organization. Not only is there abetter than being fined, or worse, shut down.
conflict of interest, this situation rises to the level ofThis list is by no means exhaustive. We could easily
inurement because the board cannot form a quorummake it the dirty three dozen. Knowing what your
of members who are not paid. Therefore, it isorganization is responsible for and making sure it stays
impossible to establish compensation at arm's-length.compliant helps to ensure that it will be around to serve
Even if the salaries are reasonable, the situation isyour community in the years to come.
indefensible because each paid board member has a